-
Topics
Subnavigation
Topics
Electromagnetic fields
- What are electromagnetic fields?
- High-frequency fields
- Radiation protection in mobile communication
- Static and low-frequency fields
- Radiation protection relating to the expansion of the national grid
- Radiation protection in electromobility
- The Competence Centre for Electromagnetic Fields
Optical radiation
- What is optical radiation?
- UV radiation
- Visible light
- Infrared radiation
- Application in medicine and wellness
- Application in daily life and technology
Ionising radiation
- What is ionising radiation?
- Radioactivity in the environment
- Applications in medicine
- Applications in daily life and in technology
- Radioactive radiation sources in Germany
- Register high-level radioactive radiation sources
- Type approval procedure
- Items claiming to provide beneficial effects of radiation
- Cabin luggage security checks
- Radioactive materials in watches
- Ionisation smoke detectors (ISM)
- Radiation effects
- What are the effects of radiation?
- Effects of selected radioactive materials
- Consequences of a radiation accident
- Cancer and leukaemia
- Hereditary radiation damage
- Individual radiosensitivity
- Epidemiology of radiation-induced diseases
- Ionising radiation: positive effects?
- Radiation protection
- Nuclear accident management
- Service offers
-
The BfS
Subnavigation
The BfS
- Working at the BfS
- About us
- Science and research
- Laws and regulations
- Radiation Protection Act
- Ordinance on Protection against the Harmful Effects of Ionising Radiation
- Ordinance on Protection against the Harmful Effects of Non-ionising Radiation in Human Applications (NiSV)
- Frequently applied legal provisions
- Dose coefficients to calculate radiation exposure
- Links
Study on low-dose radiation and the risk of cardiovascular diseases published
Cardiovascular system
Source: peterschreiber.media/Stock.adobe.com
Radiation, which is also used in radiation applications in medicine, increases the probability of cardiovascular diseases occurring – even at comparatively low doses. This is indicated by the findings of an extensive meta-study in which the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) also participated and which was published in the prestigious British Medical Journal. For example, these findings are relevant to occupational radiation protection or patients undergoing radiotherapy.
Correlation with high radiation exposure already known
An international team of researchers reviewed more than 15,000 studies on the risk of cardiovascular diseases following radiation exposure. Of these, 93 conclusive studies were evaluated in a meta-analysis. The results indicate a moderate but statistically significant increase in risk even at a dose of less than 500 milligrays (mGy) – which is considerably less than is used in radiotherapy.
"The link between ionising radiation and the risk of cardiovascular disease has long been known in research. However, the associated studies related to high doses of several grays"
, says co-author PD Dr Michaela Kreuzer, Head of the "Effects and Risks of Ionising and Non-Ionising Radiation" division at the BfS. "In recent years, there has been increasing evidence of an increased risk – even at considerably lower radiation doses. The results of the current meta-analysis clearly support this assumption."
The risk also increases in the low-dose range
CT scan
Source: Johnny Greig via Getty Images
The studies included in the analysis cover a wide range of radiation exposures in different situations. These are data mainly from radiotherapy and occupational radiation exposure but also from radiological diagnostics.
The researchers concluded that the risk of cardiovascular disease increases with the radiation dose. Even when considering moderate doses of less than 500 mGy or low dose rates of less than 5 mGy per hour, there was still a correlation.
Nevertheless, the resulting risks for the population are rather low for most situations involving exposure to radiation. With a comparatively high radiation dose of 1 Gray, the additional absolute lifetime risk would be between 2 and 4%.
In the study, the authors conclude by emphasising the need for research in the moderate and low dose range. There is still too little is known about the underlying biological mechanisms of action in order to be able to better assess and evaluate the risks.
State of 2023.03.09