-
Topics
Subnavigation
Topics
Electromagnetic fields
- What are electromagnetic fields?
- High-frequency fields
- Radiation protection in mobile communication
- Static and low-frequency fields
- Radiation protection relating to the expansion of the national grid
- Radiation protection in electromobility
- The Competence Centre for Electromagnetic Fields
Optical radiation
- What is optical radiation?
- UV radiation
- Visible light
- Infrared radiation
- Application in medicine and wellness
- Application in daily life and technology
Ionising radiation
- What is ionising radiation?
- Radioactivity in the environment
- Applications in medicine
- Applications in daily life and in technology
- Radioactive radiation sources in Germany
- Register high-level radioactive radiation sources
- Type approval procedure
- Items claiming to provide beneficial effects of radiation
- Cabin luggage security checks
- Radioactive materials in watches
- Ionisation smoke detectors (ISM)
- Radiation effects
- What are the effects of radiation?
- Effects of selected radioactive materials
- Consequences of a radiation accident
- Cancer and leukaemia
- Hereditary radiation damage
- Individual radiosensitivity
- Epidemiology of radiation-induced diseases
- Ionising radiation: positive effects?
- Radiation protection
- Nuclear accident management
- Service offers
-
The BfS
Subnavigation
The BfS
- Working at the BfS
- About us
- Science and research
- Laws and regulations
- Radiation Protection Act
- Ordinance on Protection against the Harmful Effects of Ionising Radiation
- Ordinance on Protection against the Harmful Effects of Non-ionising Radiation in Human Applications (NiSV)
- Frequently applied legal provisions
- Dose coefficients to calculate radiation exposure
- Links
1.1. Meta-analysis of the association between neurodegenerative diseases and exposure to magnetic fields
Objective
Since the publication of the meta-analysis on occupational exposure to magnetic fields and neurodegenerative diseases by Vergara et al. (2013), there have been several new publications. The planned literature study should provide a summarised risk assessment of all the studies that are now available.
Assessment of the current data situation for the meta-analysis
The current state of the evidence is briefly summarised below. A scientific opinion can be found in the article Do low-frequency magnetic fields cause diseases of the nervous system? (only available as a German version).
1. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
Three new meta-analyses reported a correlation between occupational exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields and an increased risk of ALS (Huss et al. 2018; Gunnarsson und Bodin 2019; Jalilian et al. 2020). These findings are consistent with the older meta-analysis by Vergara et al. (2013). The only meta-analysis on domestic exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields and an increased risk of ALS conducted to date provided no evidence of such a correlation (Röösli 2018). A pooled study on magnetic field exposure and ALS was tendered in a separate research project (“1.2 Pooled analysis on ALS and exposure to magnetic fields”).
2. Alzheimer’s dementia
Three new meta-analyses report a correlation between occupational exposure to magnetic fields and an increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s dementia (Jalilian et al. 2018; Gunnarsson und Bodin 2019). The new results confirm findings from the meta-analysis by Vergara et al. (2013). There are currently only two studies on domestic exposure. A meta-analysis is therefore not yet feasible.
3. Other neurodegenerative diseases
A new meta-analysis found no evidence of an increased risk of Parkinson’s dementia in connection with exposure to magnetic fields (Gunnarsson und Bodin 2019). This is consistent with the older meta-analysis by Vergara et al. (2013). For other diseases (e.g. multiple sclerosis or other types of dementia), no renewed meta-analysis was carried out. In the meta-analysis by Vergara et al. (2013), no risk increase was shown for occupational exposure to magnetic fields. The study situation on these diseases and a potential correlation with exposure to magnetic fields does not yet allow for a meta-analysis.
Summary
- The newly published meta-analyses (2018–2020) bring the evidence up to date. Therefore, no gain in knowledge is to be expected from a renewed meta-analysis. The project has therefore been cancelled.
- However, the evidence reported in the new meta-analyses for increased risks of ALS and Alzheimer's dementia in connection with occupational exposure to magnetic fields has limited informative value. There was evidence of publication bias (Gunnarsson und Bodin 2019; Jalilian et al. 2020). Possible misclassification of exposure and confounding were also identified as reasons for a possible systematic bias of the results (Jalilian et al. 2018; Huss et al. 2018).
- Within the framework of the research programme "Radiation protection in power grid expansion", a parallel project was started to investigate Associations between ALS and exposure to magnetic fields. In this project, a joint analysis of high-quality epidemiological studies should reduce scientific uncertainties. The study will be announced shortly.