Summary
Leukemia contributes about 1/3 of all cancers in children below the age of fifteen. This heterogeneous, multi-factorial disease of the hematopoietic system accounts for the largest proportion of all cancers in this age group, with acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) being the most common subtype. Incidence rates show a slight increase with time.
There is increasing evidence that a first damaging event to the hematopoietic stem cells (1st hit) occurs during the prenatal phase and one or more postnatal hits are needed to transform the pre-leukemic clones into leukemia cells. In parallel to research investigating the different indicators of molecular damage, therapeutic procedures have been continually developed in the past. Today individually optimized therapeutic plans for childhood ALL patients are available which result in a survival rate of more than 80%.
In spite of the many available epidemiological studies, the exact causes of most of the leukemia cases are still unknown. The aim of the international workshop, jointly organized by ICNIRP, WHO, and BfS was to bring together experts from different disciplines to summarize the current knowledge about the role of genetic and environmental risk factors. However it became clear that the puzzles connected with leukemia are still rather incomplete and that no simple way to explain the whole processes involved in leukemia is likely to become available in the near future.
Genetic risk factors
Studies on monozygotic twins and the fact that most ALLs
occur in the age between 2 and 5 years, suggested an increased inherited
susceptibility to damage by environmental exposures in ALL patients. For
example, the chromosomal rearrangement
TEL-AML1 (t12;21) is commonly associated with ALL, but is also found in appr.
1% of children who do not develop leukemia.
Studies currently in progress are focusing on candidate
pathways involved in protection against various external threats. These include
folate metabolism, immune function, xenobiotic metabolism, DNA repair and
oxidative stress. The research into genetic predisposition is challenged by the
fact that the expected effect sizes for common, low-penetrance markers are
small requiring large sample sizes.
Environmental risk factors
(i) Two forms of ionizing radiation exposure were discussed:
singular relatively high exposures; and chronic low dose exposures. These
included:
- X-ray examinations during pregnancy, i.e. prenatal exposures
of the mother through diagnostic x-ray procedures. The Oxford survey of
childhood cancers revealed a clear exposure-risk relationship, whereas data on
postnatal X-ray exposures were inconclusive.
- Knowledge from studies of the Japanese atomic bomb
survivors.
- Proximity to nuclear power plants: the current German study
(KiKK-Study) was compared with British and other European studies. The results
of the KiKK-Study lead to reanalyzes of the national data in the UK, but these
could not support the German results. There is no obvious explanation for the
differences. Only with regard to site location was it obvious that almost all
UK nuclear power plants are in coastal locations, which is not the case in
Germany.
- Indoor radon exposure: Studies so far show inconsistent
results. Many studies designs were poor, because the radon exposure was not
measured individually. In a current study from Denmark, a model was developed
and validated to calculate the radon levels in residences of children. In this
study the cumulative radon exposure (intensity x time) was associated with an increased
risk for ALL.
(ii) Epidemiological studies on non-ionizing radiation in
the low frequency range (50/60 Hz) have consistently shown an increased leukemia risk from magnetic field
strengths above 0.3 -0.4 µT. There is no
biological explanation or support from animal studies for such findings. Recent
powerful epidemiological studies involving
high frequency electromagnetic fields caused e.g. by high power radio
and TV transmitter, do not indicate a causal relationship.
(iii) Pesticides and other chemicals have been investigated
as risk factors for several decades, with relatively small observed risk
factors (OR <2). However, exposure assessment has been rare, and recent
validation studies have shown that previous exposure assessments based on self
reports were in part heavily over-estimated. Thus, misclassification (false
positive) has to be taken into account and, so far, only solvents have been
confirmed as a risk factor.
(iv) The data showing a relation between elevated risk and
elevated birth weight are relatively consistent. The basic hypothesis is that
an excess of growth factors may result in an amplification of proliferative
processes in the hematopoietic system. In this connection, the role of folic
acid, diet and the age of the mother has been investigated without definite
results to date. The influence of the social status was included in some
studies, but the results were inconsistent.
(v) Current complex evidence supports the hypothesis that
the second (or last, postnatal) damaging event, that leads to manifestation of
leukemia, may be related to a deregulation of the immune system. The clear
incidence peak of the disease in children aged 2-5 years in industrialized
countries can be related to the common ALL (aberrant B-lymphocyte precursor
cells). It is assumed that insufficient or delayed activation of the immune
system (isolation, too little social contact, too much hygiene) might be a risk
factor. A current meta-analysis of day care studies supports this hypothesis.
The results show a consistent and in part considerable reduction in risk for
children participating in day care programs. Participation in day care is used
as an indicator for first social contacts and the associated activation of the
immune system.
Conclusions and suggestions for future work
Leukemia in children is a multi-factorial disease and none
of the environmental risk factors mentioned above prove to have major
explanatory power. The observed risk factors were small, in general less than
2. In all areas similar problems were discussed. Essential, but difficult to
provide retrospectively, is an improved exposure assessment to prevent
misclassification. Confounders seem to have little influence on the results. It
became evident, that new ways of research are needed as there is no simple
explanation for the etiology of childhood leukemia.
Genetic studies on associations between a specific gene and
childhood leukemia need sufficient power to detect small effect sizes. Individual
studies might not be able to overcome the foreseen challenges. The need for
larger sample sizes and the need for pooling genetic, environmental and behavioral
data has led to the initiation of the Childhood Leukemia International
Consortium. It was stated at the workshop that concerted efforts must be made
to increase our knowledge in the genetic basis of hematopoietic cancers, the
role of the immune system and the interactions between genes and environmental
factors.
A summary of all presentations is available on the ICNIRP
website (www.icnirp.org). Manuscripts from
the presentations are published in the Journal of Radiation Protection
Dosimetry (Volume 132, No. 2, 2008).
|