Specific absorption rate for whole body exposure of children
Individual radiosensitivity in lung cancer families
Determination of the RBE for neutrons
Influence of human factors on the findings of non-destructive material testing
Assessment of the possibility of undetected progress of material damage in pressurised components
Risk communication related to low-frequency fields
Molecular parameters of radiosensitivity
Dosimetry with electronic dosemeters
Magnetic fields caused by electric and hybrid drive concepts
Interne Radiodekontamination von Personen
Risks of electromagnetic fields in the view of German general practitioners
Investigations of a site intended as repository, including an international comparison
Molecular biomarkers of cellular and clinical radiosensitivity
Additional analysis of the QUEBEB-Study
Growth of breast cancer cell lines under magnetic field influence
Reliability enhancement of RODOS results for a BWR NPP
Determination of WiMAX Exposure
Cohort study of cancer incidence among children
Representativeness of nuclide vectors in clearance measurements
Survey of statistical data of dental X-ray examinations on children
Investigations of the biokinetics of zirconium and ruthenium isotopes as well as of lanthanides
Round robin test for clearance measurements
Risk communication in the UV domain
Further development of the input parameters of LASAIR - 3607S04553
Personal electronic dosemeters for official individual monitoring in Germany
Influence of high-frequency electromagnetic fields of mobile communication on the metabolic rate
Epidemiological study on childhood cancer (KiKK)
BMU-Schriftenreihe

Home > ... > ... > Dosimetry with electronic dosemeters

Dosimetry with electronic dosemeters in pulsed photon radiation fields - 3608S02002

urn:nbn:de:0221-2009082197
BfS-RESFOR-17/09

Summary

In this report, the influence of pulsed radiation fields on electronic personal dosemeters (EPD) based on Silicon semiconductor detectors has been studied. Due to physical effects in the detector and an unavoidable delay during data processing, there is a dead time after each measured event. This causes a loss of pulses – the so-called dead time loss –, especially for high dose rates.
This effect is amplified in pulsed radiation fields. Even if the average dose rate is equal to that of a stationary radiation field, the dose rate during a pulse can be up to several magnitudes higher. Consequently, the dead time loss increases.
In case of a rectangular pulse shape, the dead time loss for a given dose rate can be calculated explicitly via a given empirical formula. For arbitrary pulses, a Monte-Carlo code has been developed. If the dead time and the calibration factor of the dosemeter are known, it is possible to obtain the operational range for any pulsed radiation field.
This calculation has been carried out for two exemplary pulsed radiation sources. For the Dosilab EDM-III and a model dosemeter based on approximated parameters, the responsivity was calculated. The evaluated dose range is deemed sufficient for radiation protection purposes. Two other dosemeters, namely the MGP DMX 2000X and Thermo EPD N2 resp. Mk2 could not be rated as the necessary parameters have not been disclosed by the manufacturers. However, judging by experimental reports on these dosemeters in comparison to the EDM-III, the operational ranges should be similar.
In general, if the maximal pulse dose rate does not exceed 4 Sv/h, then any of the studied dosemeters are usable both in stationary and in pulsed radiation fields with dead time loss no more than 20%. From the perspective of radiation protection, the EPD can be deployed without restrictions in such radiation fields. The dosemeters may still be used for higher pulse dose rates. In this case however, an individual analysis using the means compiled in this report is recommended.
There are applications where the pulse width is shorter than the dead time of the dosemeter. In this case, the dose per pulse is the relevant quantity to evaluate the operational range of the EPD. The dosemeters are usable as long as the dose per pulse does not exceed 45% of the calibration factor that describes the average dose per detector count.

Final report (german)  PDF 0,5 MB
Printer safe version